Archive

After reading this article, please click here to visit our new site.


New! Take our online contraception poll! Click [here]
 

[back to pregnancy and conception]

Pregnancy and Conception Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. Is Implantation the medically accepted start of pregnancy?

2. If a new life can be formed in a Petri dish, and a Petri dish cannot be pregnant, then can't it be said that a woman isn't pregnant at fertilization?

3. Does an embryo have to be in the womb for a woman to be pregnant?

4. If pregnancy can only be detected as early as implantation, does this mean that pregnancy starts at implantation?

5. The literature I've read said Plan B isn't an abortion pill, so how can you claim it is an abortifacient?

6. Isn't pregnancy a medical condition, and therefore, not subject to the common understanding of pregnancy?

7. Doesn't conception mean implantation?

8. How can you say pregnancy begins at implantation since 50% of fertilized eggs fail to implant?

9. Does preventing implantation meet the medical definition of abortion?

10. Does In Vitro Fertilization IVF cause abortions?


1.  Is Implantation the medically accepted start of pregnancy?

No, but that's what others would like for you to believe.  The medically accepted start of pregnancy is at fertilization or just after but prior to implantation (which happens a few days later)

Most of the leading medical dictionaries list fertilization  as the beginning of pregnancy (or immediately after fertilization, but prior to implantation). 

Those who are involved in abortion, in vitro fertilization IVF, or embryonic/stem cell research favor the definitions with soften the implications of the work they do.  Most other medical professionals however, tend to hold the position that pregnancy begins at fertilization.  (This wasn't even a subject of debate until 1965, when the ACOG changed their definition of conception)

To view the historical and current definitions (including those from major medial dictionaries), click here.

2.  If a new life can be formed in a Petri dish, and a Petri dish cannot be pregnant, then can't it be said that a woman isn't pregnant at fertilization?

No. 

Petri dishes, while capable of holding newly created life, are not capable of reproducing themselves, nor do they carry their own offspring.

A Petri dish holding a tiny human is no more pregnant than an incubator holding a premature baby is. Machines, glass, plastic are objects and not beings. The word "pregnancy", in the biological and medical sense, is restricted to living beings.

A pregnancy which originates from fertilization in a Petri dish (IVF) skips the normal fertilization "phase". This does not mean that implantation marks the start of all pregnancies, it only means that this particular method of achieving pregnancy skips fertilization inside of a woman. It's the exception to the rule, not the rule itself.

3.  Does an embryo have to be in the womb for a woman to be pregnant?

No.  Ectopic pregnancies, which basically mean a pregnancy which has implanted in the wrong place, exist outside of the womb.  Even though the location of the offspring is outside of the womb, it is still considered a pregnancy.  This only goes to illustrate that pregnancy need not occur in the womb.

4.  If pregnancy can only be detected as early as implantation, does this mean that pregnancy starts at implantation?

Let's apply this claim to cancer. No credible physician will tell a cancer patient that they did not have cancer prior to a positive diagnosis. Instead, they say things like "we caught it early" or "we caught it too late". But they would never say "you never had cancer until we could diagnose it." Yet, when it comes to the state of pregnancy, this is exactly what some OB/GYNs and medical organizations are promoting. In their twisted view, pregnancy only starts at the earliest possible moment of diagnosis -- implantation.

A diagnosis of pregnancy at implantation is simply that – the discovery of an existing but previously un-diagnosable condition. A positive diagnosis isn't the beginning of a condition, nor does it cause a condition, it’s merely the confirmation or discovery of it. After all, pregnancy tests do not cause pregnancy and cancer tests do not cause cancer -- they only confirm the presence or absence of these conditions.

The earliest point at which pregnancy can be reliably detected does not define when pregnancy begins, it only indicates the earliest point this pre-existing condition can be detected.

5.  The literature I've read said Plan B isn't an abortion pill, so how can you claim it is an abortifacient?

Barr Pharmaceuticals, the makers of Plan B, admit that it can prevent implantation of a fertilized egg (which is a newly created and unique human being.)

The literature, including Barr's own, often says two things: 

1.  Plan B isn't "the" abortion pill RU-486.  This is a true statement but one use to obfuscate the way Plan B can work -- it has nothing to do with the issue at hand other than to try and confuse people into thinking that Plan B pill doesn't cause abortions.

2.  It claims that Plan B cannot interfere with an established/existing pregnancy.  That untrue, since it can prevent implantation. They can only get away with this by using a non-scientific definition of pregnancy -- beginning with implantation.  The fact is, pregnancy begins with fertilization and the prevention of implantation is an abortion.  Plan B is thought to be capable of preventing implantation.
 

6.  Isn't pregnancy a medical condition, and therefore, not subject to the common understanding of pregnancy?

No.  Pregnancy is the natural state of carrying young inside a woman.  This isn't a disease or syndrome, but a natural state of being.  It takes place in a biological being and also takes up space within such a being.  In a nutshell, when a new human takes up space within a woman, she is pregnant -- carrying her [or another's] young insider her body.  Medical definitions which stray from this understanding stray from science and the long standing medically accepted definition of pregnancy -- and common sense.

7.  Doesn't conception mean implantation?

No.  Though it is often misused to mean implantation, the historical and current medical definition of conception is fertilization.  Most major medical dictionaries list fertilization as the definition of conception.

8.  How can you say pregnancy begins at implantation since 50% of fertilized eggs fail to implant?

Miscarriages (unintentional abortion) do not define when pregnancy begins -- they only define when one ends.   Miscarriages happen during all phases of pregnancy, and should not be used as a basis for defining when pregnancy begins.

9.  Does preventing implantation meet the medical definition of abortion?

Yes.  Preventing implantation meets the definition of abortion:

a·bor·tion (-bôrshn) n. 
1.  The expulsion of an embryo or fetus before it is viable.
2.  A miscarriage.
3.  An aborted organism.
4.  Cessation of normal growth, especially of an organ or other body part, before full development or maturation.
5.  The arrest of an action or process before its completion.

Source: The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary
Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.

10. Does In Vitro Fertilization IVF cause abortions

Yes, embryos which fail to implant or which die outside of a woman are aborted.  Consider the definition of abortion:

a·bor·tion (-bôrshn) n. 
1.  The expulsion of an embryo or fetus before it is viable.
2.  A miscarriage.
3.  An aborted organism.
4.  Cessation of normal growth, especially of an organ or other body part, before full development or maturation.
5.  The arrest of an action or process before its completion.

Source: The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary
Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.